[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADRPPNSMn=hqqJ8j_5D8WGpbxo-dw-XV_vHkQ1zxJymT7rspLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:15:31 +0800
From: Leo Li <pku.leo@...il.com>
To: Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@....com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, oss@...error.net,
xiaobo.xie@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qe_ic: fix a buffer overflow error and add check elsewhere
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@....com> wrote:
> 127 is the theoretical up boundary of QEIC number,
> in fact there only be 44 qe_ic_info now.
> add check to overflow for qe_ic_info
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@....com>
Acked-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
Regards,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists