linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/17] perf hists browser: Fix context menu item

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160122110830.GC8942@danjae.kornet>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:08:30 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] perf hists browser: Fix context menu item

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:51:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:07:10PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:52:45PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 01:03:08AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > > > When symbol sort key is not given, it doesn't show any item other than
> > > > exit.  Check sort key to select possible items.  Also check items more
> > > > strictly using sort key information.
> 
> > > So, without this patch when I press enter on 'perf top' I can zoom into
> > > threads, with it I lose that option.
>  
> > Yes, but it was incorrect information.  The default sort key of 'perf
> > top' doesn't contain 'comm' (or 'pid') so hist entries it shows can
> > have samples from different threads.  The result is that it only shows
> > thread of the first sample of the entry.  Filtering based on this
> > incorrect info should be avoided IMHO.
> 
> Ok, agreed, but this patch is doing way too many things at once, please
> take a look at my current perf/core branch, it has the first few patches
> I carved out from this one, see if you are ok with it, will continue.

Look good to me!

> 
> And this is not hierarchy related, so will go first, as fixes in
> perf/core.

Thanks,
Namhyung