linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-4.5-fixes] cpuset: make mm migration asynchronous

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56A24EAD.1010507@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:45:49 +0100
From:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-4.5-fixes] cpuset: make mm migration
 asynchronous

On 01/22/2016 04:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Christian.
> 
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 03:24:40PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Hmmm I just realized that this patch slightly differs from the one that
>> I tested. Do we need a retest?
> 
> It should be fine but I'd appreciate if you can test it again.

I did restart the test after I wrote the mail. The latest version from this mail
thread is still fine as far as I can tell.
Thanks

Christian