[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A2566D.6010408@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:18:53 -0800
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: vinod.koul@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, tony@...mide.com, nsekhar@...com,
peter.ujfalusi@...com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] tty: serial: 8250: add optional spinlock arg to
serial8250_rx_chars
Hi John,
On 01/22/2016 02:27 AM, John Ogness wrote:
> serial8250_rx_chars() must be called from interrupt context and with
> the port lock held. The port lock is released temporarily within that
> function to call tty_flip_buffer_push(). However, there may be other
> drivers that need to synchronize the tty_flip_buffer_push() call within
> serial8250_rx_chars() with other contexts. Since the port lock cannot
> be used for this synchronization, an optional spinlock argument is added.
> If non-NULL, this will be locked during the tty_flip_buffer_push() call.
I removed the port lock drop-claim in serial8250_rx_chars in patch
"serial: 8250: Remove low_latency workaround" (Greg has this patch in his
inbox but not in next because of the merge window).
IOW, you can drop this patch.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
Powered by blists - more mailing lists