lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160122171815.GD6588@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:18:15 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>
Cc:	Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
	leozwang@...gle.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
	Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] ASoC: rockchip: i2s: add support for grabbing
 output clock to codec

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:48:04PM -0800, Sonny Rao wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > If the I2S block is providing a clock to the CODEC then that's what the
> > software should do so that the CODEC can gate and ungate the clock as
> > required.  This patch has the I2S block using a clock, not providing
> > one.

> From my read of the clock diagram for RK3288  there is a single clock
> signal (labeled "clk_i2s0") that comes out of a fractional divider,
> and it is split such that one path gets sent to the I2S block and the
> second path is sent to a mux after which that signal is sent to an
> external pin that goes to the codec.

> There are separate clock gates for the two paths: one for the I2S
> block and one after that mux before the external pin.

> I'm not sure if it's being modeled that way in the Linux code or not,
> but at least physically I don't think this clock signal actually goes
> through the I2S block before being sent to the codec.

That's not really the issue here, the issue is that it's not the I2S
controller that is consuming the clock so it should not be the I2S
controller driver that ensures that the clock is enabled.  The driver
that manages the clock should be the one that uses it, like I say this
means you should add the code to enable the clock to the CODEC driver if
the CODEC driver needs the clock enabled.

> Does that help clarify?

The problem here isn't a lack of clarity in the situation.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ