lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:05:51 -0600
From:	Thor Thayer <tthayer@...nsource.altera.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
CC:	<dougthompson@...ssion.com>, <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
	<grant.likely@...aro.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <tthayer.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 1/4] EDAC, altera: Add Altera L2 Cache and OCRAM EDAC
 Support



On 01/22/2016 12:08 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 06:56:57PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> it sounds like the author of the original change is Dinh, but if you agreed
>> about authorship transfer, then "From: Thor Thayer" statement should be
>> correct, but in any case your SoB should follow Dinh's SoB, if you decide to
>> keep the latter one.
>>
>> This consideration may apply to the other changes in the changeset as well.
>
> So the patch author should be in the From:
>
> If Thor has changed the original patch considerably, then you Thor and
> Dinh could decide amongst each other who should be the author.
>
> If Thor becomes the author and lands in From:, then the commit message
> could state something like "based on original work from Dinh" or
> "Originally-from: Dinh" and so on. "git log" has some examples.
>
> The SOB chain shows who handled the patch on its way upstream. So in
> this case, it should be:
>
> SOB: Dinh (if From: is Dinh - otherwise Originally-by:)
> SOB: Thor
> SOB: Boris
>
> if I'm going to pick it up and send it to Linus.
>
> Ok?
>
OK. Thank you for the explanation, it is much clearer now. I apologize 
for creating this confusion.

I was the original author for the previous versions of patches (1-6) but 
since I was out for a portion of last year, Dinh picked up version 7 and 
submitted it.

Since I'm taking it back over, Dinh and I agreed that I'll be the only 
signoff from now on. Additionally, I'll make sure I'm the From: going 
forward.

Thor

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ