[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160123102523.GC24726@rric.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 11:25:23 +0100
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] acpi, numa: introduce ACPI_HAS_NUMA_ARCH_FIXUP
On 23.01.16 17:39:19, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>
> acpi_numa_arch_fixup() is only used for IA64, x86 introduce a dummy
> function for it, when we came to a new architecture (such as ARM64),
> we need to introduce another dummy one to make the code compile.
>
> That's pretty boring so introduce ACPI_HAS_NUMA_ARCH_FIXUP and
> select it for IA64, introduce a stub function for acpi_numa_arch_fixup()
> then it's pretty clean for x86 and ARM64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/ia64/Kconfig | 1 +
I see an implementation of acpi_numa_arch_fixup() only for ia64. Why
not move it to arch/ia64 then and call it from setup_arch() in
arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c after acpi_numa_init()? It looks like we
don't need a generic solution for this. This avoids any kconfig
handling for this at all.
-Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists