[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vcq3tqFMhLqPr7Do5OC9aEqMikP8SpCf=WQ8CJZ_+C6rA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 19:20:48 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] x86/efi: use binary units when printing
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 6:34 PM, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-23 at 16:55 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> The patch series exports the arrays of binary and decimal units as
>> it's
>> described by IEC.
>>
>> First user of it is EFI code which would print sizes and other values
>> using
>> binary prefix.
>>
>> James, is this now okay to you?
>
> Patch 2 is still pointless. I happen to like the <tab><space>label:
> convention.
Even there it's just <space>label:
> I realise others don't but an entire patch simply to
> change my convention to your convention is a bit overkill.
Main point of that patch is to bring snprintf() to one line. Is it
also your style?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists