lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A3CC8B.1020205@alexanderkoch.net>
Date:	Sat, 23 Jan 2016 19:55:07 +0100
From:	Alexander Koch <mail@...xanderkoch.net>
To:	Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>
Cc:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, knaack.h@....de,
	lars@...afoo.de, Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	Michael Hornung <mhornung.linux@...il.com>, dannenberg@...com,
	balbi@...com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: light: opt3001: enable operation w/o IRQ

Am 18.01.2016 um 18:07 schrieb Martin Kepplinger:
> Am 2016-01-16 um 17:14 schrieb Alexander Koch:
>> Enable operation of the TI OPT3001 light sensor without having an
>> interrupt line available to connect the INT pin to.
>>
>> In this operation mode, we issue a conversion request and simply wait
>> for the conversion time available as timeout value, determined from
>> integration time configuration and the worst-case time given in the data
>> sheet (sect. 6.5, table on p. 5):
>>
>>   short integration time (100ms): 110ms + 3ms = 113ms
>>    long integration time (800ms): 880ms + 3ms = 883ms
>>
>> This change is transparent as behaviour defaults to using the interrupt
>> method if an interrupt no. is configured via device tree. Interrupt-less
>> operation mode is performed when no valid interrupt no. is given.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Koch <mail@...xanderkoch.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Hornung <mhornung.linux@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/iio/light/opt3001.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>  1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> Looks ok to me, although I didn't verify anything. Not very important
> suggestions for changes inline

Thanks! Suggestions noted but if nobody objects I'd stick with v2 as I'm
hoping to have it accepted in the merge window for 4.5.


Regards

Alex

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ