linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: bcm47xxsflash: use devm_ioremap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160123214918.GC24744@localhost>
Date:	Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:49:18 -0800
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>,
	Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
	Neelesh Gupta <neelegup@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: bcm47xxsflash: use devm_ioremap_nocache() instead
 of KSEG0ADDR()

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 01:38:11AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> So I wanted to stick to the cached mapping, [...]

I mentioned this earlier on, but I don't feel like I've gotten a clear
answer. Is a cached mapping actually safe here? From the looks of it,
the memory mapping is a read-only memory-mapped flash, and flash writes
/ erasures are done through a different bus (register writes vis BCMA
bus). So if we have a cached mapping of that memory, it doens't
naturally synchronize with any write/erase operations. Doesn't this mean
you might get stale data if you do a sequence of read / erase / read,
for instance, since the 2nd read will return cached data from the 1st
read?

IIUC, this could be solved by:
(a) using an uncached mapping or
(b) explicitly invalidating the relevant region after doing flash writes
or erasures

But I wonder why you haven't seen any problems if you've been using
KSEG0 (cached) this whole time. Maybe just luck? Or you don't actually
write to the flash that much?

Brian