linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: pxa: guard sub-directory with CONFIG_PINCTRL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bn8caqd1.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date:	Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:22:02 +0100
From:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: pxa: guard sub-directory with CONFIG_PINCTRL_PXA

Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> writes:

> 2016-01-24 2:56 GMT+09:00 kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>:
>> Hi Masahiro,
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on next-20160122]
>> [cannot apply to v4.4-rc8 v4.4-rc7 v4.4-rc6 v4.4]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improving the system]
>>
>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Masahiro-Yamada/pinctrl-pxa-guard-sub-directory-with-CONFIG_PINCTRL_PXA/20160123-233501
>> config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
>> reproduce:
>>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>         make ARCH=x86_64
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>>> ERROR: "pxa2xx_pinctrl_init" [drivers/pinctrl/pxa/pinctrl-pxa27x.ko] undefined!
>>
>> ---
>> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
>> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
>
>
> driver/pinctrl/pxa/ has never been compile-tested before,
It was, and runtime tested also, in a builtin form. It was not activated in the
kernel at the arch/arm pxa architecture level would be a better statement.

> [2]  this driver is declared as tristate, but it cannot be a module,
> so I posted this:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8097781/
Yes this certainly is a bug.

> I hope [2] will be applied before this patch
> in order to suppress the complaint by the kbuild test robot.
Let's see what Linus thinks of it.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert