linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 114/128] genirq: Prevent chip buslock deadlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1453672883-2708-115-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:01:09 +0000
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 114/128] genirq: Prevent chip buslock deadlock

3.16.7-ckt23 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

commit abc7e40c81d113ef4bacb556f0a77ca63ac81d85 upstream.

If a interrupt chip utilizes chip->buslock then free_irq() can
deadlock in the following way:

CPU0				CPU1
				interrupt(X) (Shared or spurious)
free_irq(X)			interrupt_thread(X)
chip_bus_lock(X)
				   irq_finalize_oneshot(X)
				     chip_bus_lock(X)
synchronize_irq(X)

synchronize_irq() waits for the interrupt thread to complete,
i.e. forever.

Solution is simple: Drop chip_bus_lock() before calling
synchronize_irq() as we do with the irq_desc lock. There is nothing to
be protected after the point where irq_desc lock has been released.

This adds chip_bus_lock/unlock() to the remove_irq() code path, but
that's actually correct in the case where remove_irq() is called on
such an interrupt. The current users of remove_irq() are not affected
as none of those interrupts is on a chip which requires buslock.

Reported-by: Fredrik Markström <fredrik.markstrom@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 kernel/irq/manage.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 3dc6a61bf06a..efd80f0af47f 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1311,6 +1311,7 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
 	if (!desc)
 		return NULL;
 
+	chip_bus_lock(desc);
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
 
 	/*
@@ -1324,7 +1325,7 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
 		if (!action) {
 			WARN(1, "Trying to free already-free IRQ %d\n", irq);
 			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
-
+			chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
 			return NULL;
 		}
 
@@ -1349,6 +1350,7 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
 #endif
 
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
+	chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
 
 	unregister_handler_proc(irq, action);
 
@@ -1422,9 +1424,7 @@ void free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
 		desc->affinity_notify = NULL;
 #endif
 
-	chip_bus_lock(desc);
 	kfree(__free_irq(irq, dev_id));
-	chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_irq);