linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 054/128] xen/events/fifo: Consume unprocessed events when a CPU dies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1453672883-2708-55-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:00:09 +0000
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@...rix.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 054/128] xen/events/fifo: Consume unprocessed events when a CPU dies

3.16.7-ckt23 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@...rix.com>

commit 3de88d622fd68bd4dbee0f80168218b23f798fd0 upstream.

When a CPU is offlined, there may be unprocessed events on a port for
that CPU.  If the port is subsequently reused on a different CPU, it
could be in an unexpected state with the link bit set, resulting in
interrupts being missed. Fix this by consuming any unprocessed events
for a particular CPU when that CPU dies.

Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@...rix.com>
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
[ luis: backported to 3.16: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c
index 48dcb2e97b90..e208af22b182 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c
@@ -281,7 +281,8 @@ static void handle_irq_for_port(unsigned port)
 
 static void consume_one_event(unsigned cpu,
 			      struct evtchn_fifo_control_block *control_block,
-			      unsigned priority, unsigned long *ready)
+			      unsigned priority, unsigned long *ready,
+			      bool drop)
 {
 	struct evtchn_fifo_queue *q = &per_cpu(cpu_queue, cpu);
 	uint32_t head;
@@ -313,13 +314,17 @@ static void consume_one_event(unsigned cpu,
 	if (head == 0)
 		clear_bit(priority, ready);
 
-	if (evtchn_fifo_is_pending(port) && !evtchn_fifo_is_masked(port))
-		handle_irq_for_port(port);
+	if (evtchn_fifo_is_pending(port) && !evtchn_fifo_is_masked(port)) {
+		if (unlikely(drop))
+			pr_warn("Dropping pending event for port %u\n", port);
+		else
+			handle_irq_for_port(port);
+	}
 
 	q->head[priority] = head;
 }
 
-static void evtchn_fifo_handle_events(unsigned cpu)
+static void __evtchn_fifo_handle_events(unsigned cpu, bool drop)
 {
 	struct evtchn_fifo_control_block *control_block;
 	unsigned long ready;
@@ -331,11 +336,16 @@ static void evtchn_fifo_handle_events(unsigned cpu)
 
 	while (ready) {
 		q = find_first_bit(BM(&ready), EVTCHN_FIFO_MAX_QUEUES);
-		consume_one_event(cpu, control_block, q, &ready);
+		consume_one_event(cpu, control_block, q, &ready, drop);
 		ready |= xchg(&control_block->ready, 0);
 	}
 }
 
+static void evtchn_fifo_handle_events(unsigned cpu)
+{
+	__evtchn_fifo_handle_events(cpu, false);
+}
+
 static void evtchn_fifo_resume(void)
 {
 	unsigned cpu;
@@ -420,6 +430,9 @@ static int evtchn_fifo_cpu_notification(struct notifier_block *self,
 		if (!per_cpu(cpu_control_block, cpu))
 			ret = evtchn_fifo_alloc_control_block(cpu);
 		break;
+	case CPU_DEAD:
+		__evtchn_fifo_handle_events(cpu, true);
+		break;
 	default:
 		break;
 	}