linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm, gup: introduce concept of "foreign" get_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160125181812.GA9050@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:18:12 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
	aarcange@...hat.com, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
	jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, gup: introduce concept of "foreign" get_user_pages()

On 01/25, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> > The uprobes is_trap_at_addr() location holds mmap_sem and
> > calls get_user_pages(current->mm) on an instruction address.  This
> > makes it a pretty unique gup caller.

Yes, in particular is_trap_at_addr() doesn't look really nice. But we need
to read the insn under mmap_sem to avoid the race with unregister + register
at the same address, so that we won't send the wrong SIGTRAP in this case.

> Changes for uprobes.c looks good to me.
> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Agreed, the changes in uprobes.c look fine.

> > @@ -1700,7 +1700,13 @@ static int is_trap_at_addr(struct mm_str
> >  	if (likely(result == 0))
> >  		goto out;
> >
> > -	result = get_user_pages(NULL, mm, vaddr, 1, 0, 1, &page, NULL);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The NULL 'tsk' here ensures that any faults that occur here
> > +	 * will not be accounted to the task.  'mm' *is* current->mm,
> > +	 * but we treat this as a 'foreign' access since it is
> > +	 * essentially a kernel access to the memory.
> > +	 */
> > +	result = get_user_pages_foreign(NULL, mm, vaddr, 1, 0, 1, &page, NULL);
> >  	if (result < 0)
> >  		return result;

Yes, but perhaps we should simply remove this get_user_pages_foreign() and just
return -EFAULT if copy_from_user_inatomic() fails. This should be very unlikely
case, I think it would be fine to restart this insn and take another bp hit to
fault this page in.

Srikar what do you think? IIRC, this get_user_pages() was needed before, when
is_trap_at_addr() had other (non-restartable) callers with mm != current->mm.

But again, I think this patch is fine, we can do this later.

Oleg.