[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160125183511.GA24981@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:35:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: 'perf stat --repeat N' oddity/regression
So it appears it broke somewhere between v4.0 and v4.1, as the v4.0 install
displays:
16,244,802,268 instructions ( +- 23.01% )
2.108676769 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.86% )
[a few minutes later]
Bisected it down to:
106a94a0f8c207ef4113ce7e32f34a00b3b174e7 is the first bad commit
commit 106a94a0f8c207ef4113ce7e32f34a00b3b174e7
Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Date: Fri Jun 26 11:29:19 2015 +0200
perf stat: Introduce read_counters function
So this look like to be a regression.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists