linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 01/22] timer: Allow to check when the timer callback has not finished yet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160125184438.GA3628@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:44:38 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/22] timer: Allow to check when the timer callback
 has not finished yet

Hello,

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:44:50PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> timer_pending() checks whether the list of callbacks is empty.
> Each callback is removed from the list before it is called,
> see call_timer_fn() in __run_timers().
> 
> Sometimes we need to make sure that the callback has finished.
> For example, if we want to free some resources that are accessed
> by the callback.
> 
> For this purpose, this patch adds timer_active(). It checks both
> the list of callbacks and the running_timer. It takes the base_lock
> to see a consistent state.
> 
> I plan to use it to implement delayed works in kthread worker.
> But I guess that it will have wider use. In fact, I wonder if
> timer_pending() is misused in some situations.

I don't think this is still necessary.  More on this later.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun