[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160125.105349.498617091020487962.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:53:49 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: haiyangz@...rosoft.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kys@...rosoft.com, olaf@...fle.de,
vkuznets@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: Fix book keeping of skb during
batching process
From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:49:31 -0800
> Since eliminating send_completion_tid from struct hv_netvsc_packet, we
> haven't add proper book keeping for the skb of the batched packet. This
> patch fixes this issue and allows the previous skb is properly freed.
> Otherwise, a panic may happen.
> Thanks to Simon Xiao <sixiao@...rosoft.com> for bisecting and analysis.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists