linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] usb: host: ehci-sched: cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:52:52 -0300
From:	"Geyslan G. Bem" <geyslan@...il.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] usb: host: ehci-sched: cleanup

2016-01-25 0:30 GMT-03:00 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 01:03:39PM -0300, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
>> 2015-12-13 13:59 GMT-03:00 Geyslan G. Bem <geyslan@...il.com>:
>> >
>> > Cleanup done with the help of coccinelle, checkpatch and cppcheck tools.
>> >
>> > Geyslan G. Bem (10):
>> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: refactor scan_isoc function
>> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: move constants to right
>> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: remove useless initializations
>> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: add spaces around operators
>> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: remove prohibited spaces
>> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: remove useless else branch
>> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: use C89-style comments
>> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: add line after declarations
>> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: use sizeof operator with parens
>> >   usb: host: ehci-sched: remove unnecessary braces
>> >
>> >  drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c | 522 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> >  1 file changed, 261 insertions(+), 261 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > --
>> > 2.6.3
>> >
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Disturbing eggnogs... :-)
>>
>> This bunch will be applied?
>
> Ok, I tried to dig through all of these, but I have over 50+ emails from
> you, and it's not quite obvious which ones should be applied, and which
> are superseaded by a new series.  So can you just send me all of your
> outstanding patches, in one series, with all of the accumulated (if any)
> acks you have gotten for them, so that I can queue them up?  That will
> make my life much easier.

Ok Greg, there was three patchset versions for this file that would
count over 40+ emails. This is v3. I didn't find any answer with ack
for it.
About sending, there's no problem, I'm here trying to help :-) but in
order to not increase the noise that I have created I would like to
wait Alan's answer.

Alan, could you please analyze this?

Thank you.

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h



-- 
Regards,

Geyslan G. Bem
hackingbits.com