lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1453758918-3577213-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 22:54:56 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] tty: nozomi: avoid a harmless gcc warning

The nozomi wireless data driver has its own helper function to
transfer data from a FIFO, doing an extra byte swap on big-endian
architectures, presumably to bring the data back into byte-serial
order after readw() or readl() perform their implicit byteswap.

This helper function is used in the receive_data() function to
first read the length into a 32-bit variable, which causes
a compile-time warning:

drivers/tty/nozomi.c: In function 'receive_data':
drivers/tty/nozomi.c:857:9: warning: 'size' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

The problem is that gcc is unsure whether the data was actually
read or not. We know that it is at this point, so we can replace
it with a single readl() to shut up that warning.

I am leaving the byteswap in there, to preserve the existing
behavior, even though this seems fishy: Reading the length of
the data into a cpu-endian variable should normally not use
a second byteswap on big-endian systems, unless the hardware
is aware of the CPU endianess.

There appears to be a lot more confusion about endianess in this
driver, so it probably has not worked on big-endian systems in
a long time, if ever, and I have no way to test it. It's well
possible that this driver has not been used by anyone in a while,
the last patch that looks like it was tested on the hardware is
from 2008.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
 drivers/tty/nozomi.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/nozomi.c b/drivers/tty/nozomi.c
index 80f9de907563..5cc80b80c82b 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/nozomi.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/nozomi.c
@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ static int receive_data(enum port_type index, struct nozomi *dc)
 	struct tty_struct *tty = tty_port_tty_get(&port->port);
 	int i, ret;
 
-	read_mem32((u32 *) &size, addr, 4);
+	size = __le32_to_cpu(readl(addr));
 	/*  DBG1( "%d bytes port: %d", size, index); */
 
 	if (tty && test_bit(TTY_THROTTLED, &tty->flags)) {
-- 
2.7.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ