[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A6A178.9020200@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 17:28:08 -0500
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Cc: david.vrabel@...rix.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
roger.pau@...rix.com, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/12] xen/hvmlite: Bootstrap HVMlite guest
On 01/25/2016 04:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/25/16 13:12, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> Perhaps, but someone would still have to set hardware_subarch. And
>>> it's hvmlite_bootparams() that does it.
>> No, Xen would do it as well, essentially all of hvmlite_bootparams() could be
>> done in Xen.
>>
> Or a stub code.
This patch in fact is the stub for Xen HVMlite guests, after we are done
with it we jump to bare-metal startup code (i.e startup_32|64)
-boris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists