linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND v2 1/2] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:59:51 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND v2 1/2] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7

On Monday 25 January 2016 09:50:20 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> +# ARM64 SoCs (e.g. Exynos5433, Exynos7):
> +config EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK
> +       def_bool ARCH_EXYNOS
> +       depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> +       select COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
> 

So you always enable it on ARM64 when ARCH_EXYNOS is enabled, but
enable it silently on ARM32 when COMPILE_TEST is set?

That sounds wrong. How about

config EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK
	bool "EXYNOS 64-bit clock support" if COMPILE_TEST
	default ARM64 && ARCH_EXYNOS
	depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_EXYNOS) || COMPILE_TEST
	select COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG

	Arnd