[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4282078.QlIpNj3Oa6@wuerfel>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:59:51 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND v2 1/2] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7
On Monday 25 January 2016 09:50:20 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> +# ARM64 SoCs (e.g. Exynos5433, Exynos7):
> +config EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK
> + def_bool ARCH_EXYNOS
> + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> + select COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
>
So you always enable it on ARM64 when ARCH_EXYNOS is enabled, but
enable it silently on ARM32 when COMPILE_TEST is set?
That sounds wrong. How about
config EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK
bool "EXYNOS 64-bit clock support" if COMPILE_TEST
default ARM64 && ARCH_EXYNOS
depends on (ARM64 && ARCH_EXYNOS) || COMPILE_TEST
select COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists