[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1453715167-26165-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:16:07 +0530
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list
Currently next_policy() explicitly checks if a policy is the last
policy in the cpufreq_policy_list. Use the standard list_is_last
primitive instead.
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 78b1e2f..b3059a3 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -67,11 +67,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *next_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
lockdep_assert_held(&cpufreq_driver_lock);
do {
- policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
-
/* No more policies in the list */
- if (&policy->policy_list == &cpufreq_policy_list)
+ if (list_is_last(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list))
return NULL;
+
+ policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
} while (!suitable_policy(policy, active));
return policy;
--
1.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists