lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:16:30 +0000
From:	"Singhal, Maneesh" <Maneesh.Singhal@....com>
To:	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
CC:	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"JBottomley@...n.com" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
	"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/emcctd: drivers/scsi/emcctd: Client driver
 implementation for  EMC-Symmetrix GuestOS emulated Cut-Through Device

Thanks a lot for detailed information. Appreciate it !

Regards
Maneesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johannes Thumshirn [mailto:jthumshirn@...e.de]
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 3:39 PM
> To: Singhal, Maneesh
> Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> JBottomley@...n.com; martin.petersen@...cle.com; linux-
> api@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/emcctd: drivers/scsi/emcctd: Client
> driver implementation for EMC-Symmetrix GuestOS emulated Cut-
> Through Device
> 
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:30:47AM +0000, Singhal, Maneesh wrote:
> > Thanks Johannes for generously reviewing my patch. It indeed is
> going to improve the thing a lot. I agree with all your comments so far,
> and will submit a newer patch soon.
> > Since this is my first patch, I have couple of questions regarding
> submitting the patch:
> >
> > 1.  Is there a page/place where I can see the review comments
> rather neatly ?, finding out all the comments and infact reading to
> entire code on text file is cumbersome. If there is no way, then its
> fine,... I can live with it.
> 
> Nope unfortunately not. That's why it's nice when people trim their e-
> mails
> ;-)
> 
> > 2. When I address the review comments and want to resubmit the
> patch, do I need to submit the incremental patch or the entire code
> patch again ? git-format-patch gives me incremental patch only.
> 
> Ususally you change your code and do a git commit --amend. This
> modifies your commit instead of creating a new one. If you already
> have a new commit than you can use git rebase -i <version befor
> commit to amend> and squash the commit's into one (git gives you a
> nice readme when doing rebase -i). Afterwards you do a git format-
> patch -1 -v 2, this creates a v2-0001-your-patch-name.patch for git
> send-email which has an updated [PATCH V2] in the subject.
> 
> At least, the above is the way I do it (i.e. there are more than one ways
> to do it).
> 
> 
> --
> Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
> jthumshirn@...e.de                                +49 911 74053 689
> SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG
> Nürnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D
> 2D76 0850

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ