linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: Add document for MT6323 regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 11:37:10 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Chen Zhong <chen.zhong@...iatek.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>,
	Steven Liu <steven.liu@...iatek.com>,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: Add document for MT6323
 regulator

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:40:04AM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> Based on the MT6397 binding documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org

In reply to your previous submission I said:

| important.  Please also use subject lines matching the style for the
| subsystem (for patch 1).

Please don't ignore review comments, people are generally making them
for a reason and are likely to have the same concerns if issues remain
unaddressed.  Having to repeat the same comments can get repetitive and
make people question the value of time spent reviewing.  If you disagree
with the review comments that's fine but you need to reply and discuss
your concerns so that the reviewer can understand your decisions.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)