[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1601251511350.21446@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:17:09 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Michal Malý <madcatxster@...oid-pointer.net>
cc: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
elias.vds@...il.com, edwin@...ds.nl, simon@...gewell.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add a skeleton module to perform a basic initialization
on certain USB devices
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016, Michal Malý wrote:
> I briefly considered leaving the switch up to the userspace and handling the
> device in the kernel only once it's been switched. I am however uncertain how
> to advertise this to the users. Writing a tiny app that would currently handle
> just one device seems like an overkill, abusing usb_modeswitch seems counter-
> intuitive as it's purpose is to handle various USB modems.
Well, originally usb_modeswitch (beware, it's called "modeswitch", not
"modemswitch" :) ) was purely for handling ZeroCD on USB 3G modems, and
it's currently still by far the most common case, but there are other
devices being handled by that package now; I for example recall some
HP printers needing a magic USB command to be sent to it before they would
start printing, and usb_modeswitch is handling those now AFAIK.
So if we do this in userspace, I think usb_modeswitch is not a bad choice.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists