[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A63A20.4040602@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 21:07:12 +0600
From: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: parse SPCR and enable matching console
On 25.01.2016 20:14, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Aleksey Makarov
> <aleksey.makarov@...aro.org> wrote:
>> 'ARM Server Base Boot Requiremets' [1] mention SPCR
>> (Serial Port Console Redirection Table) [2] as a mandatory ACPI table
>> that specifies the configuration of serial console.
>>
>> Parse this table and check if any registered console match
>> the description. If it does, enable that console.
>>
>> To implement that, introduce a new member
>> int (*acpi_match)(struct console *, struct acpi_table_spcr *)
>> of struct console. It allows drivers to check if they provide
>> a matching console device.
>>
>> [1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.den0044a/index.html
>> [2] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn639131(v=vs.85).aspx
>
> Can you split this to several patches?
I am not sure I should.
> I see preparatory patch in console code, i.e.
> delete_from_console_list(), adding SPCR support to ACPI, enabling it.
It would be difficult to justify delete_from_console_list() in a
separate patches before the rest of the changes. And enabling SPCR in a
separate patch also looks oddly for me.
It would be great to have other comments on this before I fix this in
the next version.
Thank you
Powered by blists - more mailing lists