linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/fpu: Fix FNSAVE usage in eagerfpu mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56A65AE3.9040405@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:26:59 -0800
From:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/fpu: Fix FNSAVE usage in eagerfpu mode

On 01/25/2016 09:25 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Even if we do the cleanup, I think I'd rather fix the bug in place
> first so the diff is clearer and then clean it up on top of that.
> 
> Does that seem reasonable?

Yup, sounds fine to me.