linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160126145153.44e4f38b04200209d133c0a3@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:51:53 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@...il.com>,
	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: support CONFIG_ZONE_DEVICE + CONFIG_ZONE_DMA

On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:33:48 -0800 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:

> >> Towards this end, alias ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DEVICE to work around needing
> >> to maintain a unique zone number for ZONE_DEVICE.  Record the geometry
> >> of ZONE_DMA at init (->init_spanned_pages) and use that information in
> >> is_zone_device_page() to differentiate pages allocated via
> >> devm_memremap_pages() vs true ZONE_DMA pages.  Otherwise, use the
> >> simpler definition of is_zone_device_page() when ZONE_DMA is turned off.
> >>
> >> Note that this also teaches the memory hot remove path that the zone may
> >> not have sections for all pfn spans (->zone_dyn_start_pfn).
> >>
> >> A user visible implication of this change is potentially an unexpectedly
> >> high "spanned" value in /proc/zoneinfo for the DMA zone.
> >
> > Well, all these icky tricks are to avoid increasing ZONES_SHIFT, yes?
> > Is it possible to just use ZONES_SHIFT=3?
> 
> Last I tried I hit this warning in mm/memory.c
> 
> #warning Unfortunate NUMA and NUMA Balancing config, growing
> page-frame for last_cpupid.

Well yes, it may take a bit of work - perhaps salvaging a bit from
somewhere else if poss.  But that might provide a better overall
solution so could you please have a think?