[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160126151408.85a48aa035a4e72243d4003c@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:14:08 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/bug: make panic_on_warn available for all
architectures
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:12:16 +0100 Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> Christian Borntraeger reported that panic_on_warn doesn't have any
> effect on s390.
>
> The panic_on_warn feature was introduced with 9e3961a09798 ("kernel:
> add panic_on_warn"). However it did care only for the case when
> WANT_WARN_ON_SLOWPATH is defined. This is turn is only the case for
> architectures which do not have an own __WARN_TAINT defined.
>
> Other architectures which do have __WARN_TAINT defined call
> report_bug() for warnings within lib/bug.c which does not call panic()
> in case panic_on_warn is set.
>
> Let's simply enable the panic_on_warn feature by adding the same code
> like it was added to warn_slowpath_common() in panic.c.
>
> This enables panic_on_warn also for arm64, parisc, powerpc, s390 and
> sh.
>
It's a bit sad to do this in two places. You couldn't find a suitable
place which is effective for all architectures?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists