linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the WinSystems EBC-C384

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56A80391.40009@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:38:57 -0500
From:	William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	wim@...ana.be, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add watchdog timer support for the
 WinSystems EBC-C384

On 01/25/2016 08:26 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> The manual for this motherboard does not provide much information about
>> the Super I/O chip (no model number, etc.), and neither sensors-detect
>> nor superiotool was able to detect it. I've sent an email to the
>> motherboard company (WinSystems) requesting further information about
>> the Super I/O chip and whether the watchdog timer is built-in to the
>> Super I/O chip.
>>
> 
> Ah, I somehow thought you were associated with WinSystems, since you know
> how to configure the chip.
> 
> Did you get any useful output from sensors-detect or superiotool
> (like 'unknown chip xxxx'), or did those tools find nothing ?

Unfortunately, the sensors-detect only reported "No" for each Super I/O  
chip test, while the superiotool gave an unhelpful "No Super I/O chip    
detected" message.                                                       

I haven't heard a response yet from WinSystems, but I'll give them a     
couple days before sending another email to their engineering            
department. For now, I'll submit a version 4 of this patch to get the    
minor updates I made out for review; for what its worth, I believe the   
dmi_match method will be sufficient until I get an update from           
WinSystems helping me get a proper check to identify the Super I/O chip. 

William Breathitt Gray