[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A71262.8000804@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:29:54 +0100
From: Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
Cc: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Paul Stewart <pstew@...omium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@...adcom.com>,
brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hante Meuleman <meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Brett Rudley <brudley@...adcom.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: sdio: Increase the default timeouts a bit
On 26-01-16 00:41, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Arend,
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 25-01-16 12:06, Julian Calaby wrote:
>>> Hi Sjoerd,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Sjoerd Simons
>>> <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> On a Radxa Rock2 board with a Ampak AP6335 (Broadcom 4339 core) it seems
>>>> the card responds very quickly most of the time, unfortunately during
>>>> initialisation it sometimes seems to take just a bit over 2 seconds to
>>>> respond.
>>>>
>>>> This results intialization failing with message like:
>>>> brcmf_c_preinit_dcmds: Retreiving cur_etheraddr failed, -52
>>>> brcmf_bus_start: failed: -52
>>>> brcmf_sdio_firmware_callback: dongle is not responding
>>>>
>>>> Increasing the timeout to allow for a bit more headroom allows the
>>>> card to initialize reliably.
>>>>
>>>> A quick search online after diagnosing/fixing this showed that Google
>>>> has a similar patch in their ChromeOS tree, so this doesn't seem
>>>> specific to the board I'm using.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>
>>>
>>> Looks sane to me.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
>>
>> Not really a cleanup patch :-p , but thanks for the review.
>
> I'm trying to review any "small" patch from (relatively) new people.
And it is surely appreciated. Just read your reply in "cleanup patch
pile" thread and felt I had to make the stupid remark with just fun
intended.
Regards,
Arend
Powered by blists - more mailing lists