[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1453789989-13260-3-git-send-email-mika.penttila@nextfour.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 08:33:09 +0200
From: <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2 v2] make apply_to_page_range() more robust.
From: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>
Now the arm/arm64 don't trigger this BUG_ON() any more,
but WARN_ON() is here enough to catch buggy callers
but still let potential other !size callers pass with warning.
Signed-off-by: Mika Penttilä mika.penttila@...tfour.com
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 30991f8..9178ee6 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1871,7 +1871,9 @@ int apply_to_page_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
unsigned long end = addr + size;
int err;
- BUG_ON(addr >= end);
+ if (WARN_ON(addr >= end))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
pgd = pgd_offset(mm, addr);
do {
next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists