lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 08:14:45 +0100 From: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org> To: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com> Cc: Steven Liu <steven.liu@...iatek.com>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Flora Fu <flora.fu@...iatek.com>, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] mfd: mediatek: add MT6323 support to MT6397 driver On 26/01/2016 04:07, Henry Chen wrote: > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 19:59 +0100, John Crispin wrote: >> >> On 25/01/2016 19:44, Matthias Brugger wrote: >>> On Monday 25 Jan 2016 16:36:40 John Crispin wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 25/01/2016 13:41, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>> Please honour the subject format of the subsystem you are contributing >>>>> to. >>>>> >>>>> `git log --oneline -- $subsystem` gives you this. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016, John Crispin wrote: >>>>>> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org> >>>>>> --- >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>>> @@ -261,6 +271,15 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device >>>>>> *pdev) >>>>>> >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> switch (id & 0xff) { >>>>>> >>>>>> + case MT6323_CID_CODE: >>>>>> + mt6397->int_con[0] = MT6323_INT_CON0; >>>>> >>>>> This is confusing. You're still using memory allocated for a mt6397 >>>>> device. >>>> >>>> the variable is currently defined as struct mt6397_chip *mt6397; >>>> shall i only change the name or also create a patch to rename the struct ? >>>> >>> >>> I think we should rename the struct and the file as well. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Matthias >> >> Hi, >> >> that would have been my next question. renaming the struct would imply >> renaming the driver and the whole namespace contained within. We would >> then also need to change the Kconfig and Makefile. I am happy to do this >> but want to be sure that is is actually wanted. >> >> John > Hi, > > Since mt6323 was similar with mt6397, I think we can reuse the > mt6397_chip without duplicate code. > > Maybe we can rename the local variable name to avoid confusing. > > struct mt6397_chip *mt_pmic; > ... > ... > switch (id & 0xff) { > case MT6323_CID_CODE: > mt_pmic->int_con[0] = MT6323_INT_CON0; > mt_pmic->int_con[1] = MT6323_INT_CON1; > ... > ... > > Henry Hi, IMHO we should either rename the namespace or not. renaming some variables seems weird as that will just move the confusion/inconsistency to another place in the code. I am however rather indifferent on this matter. John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists