lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1453795504-12302-3-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:05:03 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7

Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit.
There won't be a single kernel image for ARMv7 and ARMv8 SoCs (like
multi_v7 for ARMv7).

Instead build clock drivers only for respective SoC's architecture.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>

---

Changes since v2:
1. Follow Arnd's advice making EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK user-visible when
   COMPILE_TEST is enabled.
2. Dropped accumulated tags because the logic is now different.

Changes since v1:
1. Use one Kconfig symbol for clocks of all ARM64 SoCs (after
   discussion): EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK.
2. Minor cleanups after Tomasz's comments.
3. Added tags: Chanwoo's, Sylwester's, Alim's and Tomasz's (the tags
   were given for v1 but assuming that change from 1. is not major
   enough to require re-tagging).
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig  | 5 +++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
index dd6093a33f84..5fd982d9f4d9 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
@@ -23,3 +23,8 @@ config S3C2443_COMMON_CLK
 	bool "Samsung S3C2443 clock controller support" if COMPILE_TEST
 	select COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
 
+# ARM64 SoCs (e.g. Exynos5433, Exynos7):
+config EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK
+	bool "Samsung Exynos ARMv8-family clock controller support" if COMPILE_TEST
+	default ARM64 && COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
+	depends on (ARM64 && COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG) || COMPILE_TEST
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
index 5f6833ea355d..fc367d4b2902 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)	+= clk-exynos5250.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5260)	+= clk-exynos5260.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5410)	+= clk-exynos5410.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5420)	+= clk-exynos5420.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= clk-exynos5433.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK)	+= clk-exynos5433.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5440)	+= clk-exynos5440.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= clk-exynos-audss.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)	+= clk-exynos-clkout.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS7)	+= clk-exynos7.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK)	+= clk-exynos7.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_S3C2410_COMMON_CLK)+= clk-s3c2410.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_S3C2410_COMMON_DCLK)+= clk-s3c2410-dclk.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_S3C2412_COMMON_CLK)+= clk-s3c2412.o
-- 
1.9.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ