linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323 regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:59:59 +0100
From:	John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Chen Zhong <chen.zhong@...iatek.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>,
	Steven Liu <steven.liu@...iatek.com>,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] regulator: mt6323: Add support for MT6323
 regulator



On 26/01/2016 11:41, Paul Bolle wrote:
> John,
> 
> On ma, 2016-01-25 at 12:56 +0100, John Crispin wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/mt6323-regulator.c
> 
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> 
> This states this file is licensed GPL v2 only.
> 
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> 
> And, according to include/linux/module.h, this means "GNU Public License
> v2 or later".
> 
> So I think there's a (subtle) mismatch between the license ident used
> for this driver and the comment above.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> Paul Bolle
> 

Hi Paul,

thanks, good catch. luckily i had not sent the next version of the
series yet ;)

	John

	John