[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A6CE90.4040701@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:40:32 +0800
From: Chen Fan <chen.fan.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<rjw@...ysocki.net>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
<izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>, <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
<caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>, <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
<okaya@...eaurora.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pci: fix unavailable irq number 255 reported by BIOS
On 01/26/2016 04:58 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Thomas]
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 02:59:38PM +0800, Chen Fan wrote:
>> In our environment, when enable Secure boot, we found an abnormal
>> phenomenon as following call trace shows. after investigation, we
>> found the firmware assigned an irq number 255 which means unknown
>> or no connection in PCI local spec for i801_smbus, meanwhile the
>> ACPI didn't configure the pci irq routing. and the 255 irq number
>> was assigned for megasa msix without IRQF_SHARED. then in this case
>> during i801_smbus probe, the i801_smbus driver would request irq with
>> bad irq number 255. but the 255 irq number was assigned for memgasa
>> with MSIX enable. which will cause request_irq fails as call trace
>> shows, here we use ~0U as invalid IRQ to identify the 0xff IRQ specified
>> by BIOS.
>>
>> See the call trace:
> Maybe you missed my suggestion that the timestamps aren't useful;
> here's my suggestion again in more detail:
>
> Changelogs are written once, but read dozens or hundreds of time, so
> stripping out irrelevant details shows consideration for the readers.
Got it, thanks for your correction, I will remake it as you suggest.
>
>> [ 32.459195] ipmi device interface
>> [ 32.612907] shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4
>> [ 32.800459] ixgbe: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit PCI Express Network Driver - version 4.0.1-k-rh
>> [ 32.818319] ixgbe: Copyright (c) 1999-2014 Intel Corporation.
>> [ 32.844009] lpc_ich 0001:80:1f.0: I/O space for ACPI uninitialized
> I think the lines above are completely irrelevant.
>
>> [ 32.850093] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: enabling device (0140 -> 0143)
>> [ 32.851134] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: can't derive routing for PCI INT C
>> [ 32.851136] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C: no GSI
>> [ 32.851164] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 255. 00000080 (i801_smbus) vs. 00000000 (megasa
> These are useful, but the timestamps ("[ 32.850093]") are not.
>
>> [ 32.851168] CPU: 0 PID: 2487 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1
>> [ 32.851170] Hardware name: FUJITSU PRIMEQUEST 2800E2/D3736, BIOS PRIMEQUEST 2000 Serie5
> These are probably useful; it's nice to know what kernel and hardware
> is involved.
>
>> [ 32.851178] Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
>> [ 32.851208] ffff88086c330b00 00000000e233a9df ffff88086d57bca0 ffffffff81603f36
>> [ 32.851227] ffff88086d57bcf8 ffffffff8110d23a ffff88686fe02000 0000000000000246
>> [ 32.851246] ffff88086a9a8c00 00000000e233a9df ffffffffa00ad220 0000000000000080
> I doubt these are useful.
>
>> [ 32.851247] Call Trace:
>> [ 32.851261] [<ffffffff81603f36>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
>> [ 32.851271] [<ffffffff8110d23a>] __setup_irq+0x54a/0x570
>> [ 32.851282] [<ffffffffa00ad220>] ? i801_check_pre.isra.5+0xe0/0xe0 [i2c_i801]
>> [ 32.851289] [<ffffffff8110d3bc>] request_threaded_irq+0xcc/0x170
>> [ 32.851298] [<ffffffffa00ae87f>] i801_probe+0x32f/0x508 [i2c_i801]
>> [ 32.851308] [<ffffffff81308385>] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
> The above might be useful, but the addresses ("[<ffffffff81603f36>]")
> are not, and you should go through them manually and strip out the
> lines that are junk from the stack. For example, I don't think
> request_threaded_irq() really calls i801_check_pre().
>
>> [ 32.851315] [<ffffffff8108bfd4>] work_for_cpu_fn+0x14/0x20
>> [ 32.851323] [<ffffffff8108f0ab>] process_one_work+0x17b/0x470
>> [ 32.851330] [<ffffffff81090003>] worker_thread+0x293/0x400
>> [ 32.851338] [<ffffffff8108fd70>] ? rescuer_thread+0x400/0x400
>> [ 32.851346] [<ffffffff8109726f>] kthread+0xcf/0xe0
>> [ 32.851353] [<ffffffff810971a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
>> [ 32.851362] [<ffffffff81613cfc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
>> [ 32.851369] [<ffffffff810971a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
> The lines above are completely useless.
>
>> [ 32.851373] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: Failed to allocate irq 255: -16
>> [ 32.851435] i801_smbus: probe of 0000:00:1f.3 failed with error -16
>> [ 33.180145] ixgbe 0000:5a:00.0: Multiq[ 33.240538] ixgbe 0000:5a:00.0: (PCI Express:03:e0
>> [ 33.280826] ixgbe 0000:5a:00.0: MAC: 3, PHY: 0, PBA No: 000000-000
> These ixgbe entries are irrelevant.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Fan <chen.fan.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 2 ++
>> drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>> include/linux/interrupt.h | 9 +++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
>> index 6ca9fd6..b616d69 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
>> @@ -146,4 +146,6 @@
>> #define NR_IRQS NR_IRQS_LEGACY
>> #endif
>>
>> +#define IRQ_INVALID (~0U)
> If this is a good idea (I cc'd Thomas, the IRQ maintainer, for his
> thoughts), I'd like to see this in a more generic place so it isn't
> x86-specific.
>
>> #endif /* _ASM_X86_IRQ_VECTORS_H */
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
>> index d30184c..819eb23 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>> #include <linux/pci.h>
>> #include <linux/acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>
>> #define PREFIX "ACPI: "
>>
>> @@ -436,7 +437,15 @@ int acpi_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> * driver reported one, then use it. Exit in any case.
>> */
>> if (gsi < 0) {
>> - if (acpi_isa_register_gsi(dev))
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> + /*
>> + * The Interrupt Line value of 0xff is defined to mean "unknown"
>> + * or "no connection" (PCI 3.0, Section 6.2.4, footnote on page
>> + * 223), using ~0U as invalid IRQ.
>> + */
>> + dev->irq = (dev->irq == 0xff) ? IRQ_INVALID : dev->irq;
> It's much simpler and clearer to write:
>
> if (dev->irq == 0xff)
> dev->irq = IRQ_INVALID;
>
>> +#endif
>> + if (!irq_is_valid(dev->irq) || acpi_isa_register_gsi(dev))
>> dev_warn(&dev->dev, "PCI INT %c: no GSI\n",
>> pin_name(pin));
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
>> index cb30edb..2f0d46b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
>> @@ -198,6 +198,15 @@ extern void enable_percpu_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type);
>> extern bool irq_percpu_is_enabled(unsigned int irq);
>> extern void irq_wake_thread(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id);
>>
>> +static inline bool irq_is_valid(unsigned int irq)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> + if (irq == IRQ_INVALID)
>> + return false;
>> +#endif
>> + return true;
>> +}
> I don't like the x86 ifdef. I'd prefer:
>
> static inline bool irq_valid(unsigned int irq)
> {
> if (irq < NR_IRQS)
> return true;
> return false;
> }
>
> This could be used in many of the places that currently use NR_IRQS.
>
> My suggestion:
>
> - patch 1: Add IRQ_INVALID and irq_valid() as generic things
> - patch 2: Use irq_valid() in all the places where it can obviously
> replace NR_IRQS
> - patch 3: Add the acpi_pci_irq_enable() check. This is now a
> trivial patch, basically just this:
>
> + #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> + if (dev->irq == 0xff)
> + dev->irq = IRQ_INVALID;
> + #endif
> + if (!irq_valid(dev->irq) ...
this will be more useful.
Thanks,
Chen
>
> Bjorn
>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists