linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] selftests: use INSTALL_HDR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPKp9uahQtYKWEiS8LN0wY-CG8P5WA=+oWXQc4ASDrXsUe-Qxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:57:25 +0000
From:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] selftests: use INSTALL_HDR_PATH instead of relative paths

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>
>
> On 14/01/16 03:37, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>

[...]

>>
>> Does the patch below work for you? It uses INSTALL_HDR_PATH if it is
>> defined,
>> or otherwise KERNEL_HEADERS if it is defined, or finally it guesses at
>> ../../../usr/include (ie. the base of the source tree).
>>
>
> Yes it does work fine. So feel free to add my tested-by when you post
> the patch. Thanks for the quick and clean fix.
>

Any update on this patch ?

Regards,
Sudeep