| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:38:25 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>, jcm@...hat.com,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: implement Generic Event Device
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org> wrote:
Few comments below.
> Generic Event Device described in ACPI 6.1 allows platforms to handle
> platform interrupts in ACPI ASL statements. It borrows constructs like
> _EVT from GPIO events.
Can it share code with gpiolib-acpi.c ? I see some duplication.
> All interrupts are listed in _CRS and the handler
> is written in _EVT method. Here is an example.
>
> Device (GED0)
> {
>
> Name (_HID, "ACPI0013")
> Name (_UID, 0)
> Name(_CRS, ResourceTemplate ()
> {
> Interrupt(ResourceConsumer, Edge, ActiveHigh, Shared, , , )
> {123}
> })
>
> Method (_EVT, 1) {
> if (Lequal(123, Arg0))
> {
> }
> }
> }
>
> Wake capability has not been implemented yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/evged.c | 162 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 163 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/evged.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> index b5e7cd8..4dbb732 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ acpi-y += acpi_pnp.o
> acpi-y += int340x_thermal.o
> acpi-y += power.o
> acpi-y += event.o
> +acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY) += evged.o
> acpi-y += sysfs.o
> acpi-y += property.o
> acpi-$(CONFIG_X86) += acpi_cmos_rtc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/evged.c b/drivers/acpi/evged.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a904676
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/evged.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
> +/*
> + * Generic Event Device for ACPI.
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2016, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
> + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * Generic Event Device allows platforms to handle
> + * interrupts in ACPI ASL statements. It follows very similar
> + * _EVT method approach from GPIO events.
> + * All interrupts are listed in _CRS and the handler
> + * is written in _EVT method. Here is an example.
Can it be wider on screen?
> + *
> + * Device (GED0)
> + * {
> + *
> + * Name (_HID, "ACPI0013")
> + * Name (_UID, 0)
> + * Method (_CRS, 0x0, Serialized)
> + * {
> + * Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
> + * {
> + * Interrupt(ResourceConsumer, Edge, ActiveHigh, Shared, , , )
> + * {123}
> + * }
> + * })
> + *
> + * Method (_EVT, 1) {
> + * if (Lequal(123, Arg0))
> + * {
> + * }
> + * }
> + * }
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +
> +#define MODULE_NAME "acpi-ged"
> +
> +struct acpi_ged_event {
> + struct list_head node;
> + struct device *dev;
> + unsigned int gsi;
> + unsigned int irq;
> + acpi_handle handle;
> +};
> +
> +static irqreturn_t acpi_ged_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + struct acpi_ged_event *event = data;
> + acpi_status acpi_ret;
> +
> + acpi_ret = acpi_execute_simple_method(event->handle, NULL, event->gsi);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_ret))
> + dev_err_once(event->dev, "IRQ method execution failed\n");
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static acpi_status acpi_ged_request_interrupt(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> + void *context)
> +{
> + struct acpi_ged_event *event;
> + unsigned int irq;
> + unsigned int gsi;
> + unsigned int irqflags = IRQF_ONESHOT;
> + struct device *dev = context;
> + acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> + acpi_handle evt_handle;
> + struct resource r;
> + struct acpi_resource_irq *p = &ares->data.irq;
> + struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *pext = &ares->data.extended_irq;
> +
> + if (ares->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_END_TAG)
> + return AE_OK;
> +
> + if (!acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(ares, 0, &r)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to parse IRQ resource\n");
> + return AE_ERROR;
> + }
> + if (ares->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ)
> + gsi = p->interrupts[0];
> + else
> + gsi = pext->interrupts[0];
> +
> + irq = r.start;
> +
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EVT", &evt_handle))) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot locate _EVT method\n");
> + return AE_ERROR;
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "GED listening GSI %u @ IRQ %u\n", gsi, irq);
> +
> + event = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*event), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!event)
> + return AE_ERROR;
> +
> + event->gsi = gsi;
> + event->dev = dev;
> + event->irq = irq;
> + event->handle = evt_handle;
> +
> + if (r.flags & IORESOURCE_IRQ_SHAREABLE)
> + irqflags |= IRQF_SHARED;
> +
> + if (devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, acpi_ged_irq_handler,
> + irqflags, "ACPI:Ged", event)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to setup event handler for irq %u\n", irq);
> + return AE_ERROR;
> + }
The above part is clearly belongs to ged_probe().
> +
> + return AE_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static int ged_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + acpi_status acpi_ret;
> +
> + acpi_ret = acpi_walk_resources(ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev), "_CRS",
> + acpi_ged_request_interrupt, &pdev->dev);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_ret)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to parse the _CRS record\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct acpi_device_id ged_acpi_ids[] = {
> + {"ACPI0013"},
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver ged_driver = {
> + .probe = ged_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = MODULE_NAME,
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
Do you need this one?
> + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(ged_acpi_ids),
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static int __init ged_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&ged_driver);
> +}
> +
> +subsys_initcall(ged_init);
Any specific reason to have on that level?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists