linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 06/11] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap:: SPI_WRITE needs a different bitmask for MT2701/7623

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1453812396.10901.8.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:46:36 +0800
From:	Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
To:	John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
CC:	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Steven Liu <steven.liu@...iatek.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>,
	"Flora Fu" <flora.fu@...iatek.com>,
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 06/11] soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap:: SPI_WRITE needs a
 different bitmask for MT2701/7623



nit for the subject:

soc: mediatek: PMIC wrap:: SPI_WRITE needs a different bitmask for
MT2701/7623
                        ^^ extra : here.

Otherwise the patch looks good to me.

Joe.C

On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 10:53 +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> MT2701 and MT7623 use a different bitmask for the SPI_WRITE command.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c |   11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> index 948fc73..ba7b6b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> @@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ struct pmic_wrapper_type {
>  	enum pwrap_type type;
>  	u32 arb_en_all;
>  	u32 int_en_all;
> +	u32 spi_w;
>  	int (*init_reg_clock)(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp);
>  	int (*init_special)(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp);
>  };
> @@ -511,15 +512,15 @@ static int pwrap_reset_spislave(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
>  	pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_MAN_EN);
>  	pwrap_writel(wrp, 0, PWRAP_DIO_EN);
>  
> -	pwrap_writel(wrp, PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE | PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_CSL,
> +	pwrap_writel(wrp, wrp->master->spi_w | PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_CSL,
>  			PWRAP_MAN_CMD);
> -	pwrap_writel(wrp, PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE | PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTS,
> +	pwrap_writel(wrp, wrp->master->spi_w | PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTS,
>  			PWRAP_MAN_CMD);
> -	pwrap_writel(wrp, PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE | PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_CSH,
> +	pwrap_writel(wrp, wrp->master->spi_w | PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_CSH,
>  			PWRAP_MAN_CMD);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> -		pwrap_writel(wrp, PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE | PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTS,
> +		pwrap_writel(wrp, wrp->master->spi_w | PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTS,
>  				PWRAP_MAN_CMD);
>  
>  	ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_sync_idle);
> @@ -826,6 +827,7 @@ static struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt8135 = {
>  	.type = PWRAP_MT8135,
>  	.arb_en_all = 0x1ff,
>  	.int_en_all = BIT(31) | BIT(1),
> +	.spi_w = PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE,
>  	.init_reg_clock = pwrap_mt8135_init_reg_clock,
>  	.init_special = pwrap_mt8135_init_special,
>  };
> @@ -835,6 +837,7 @@ static struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt8173 = {
>  	.type = PWRAP_MT8173,
>  	.arb_en_all = 0x3f,
>  	.int_en_all = BIT(31) | BIT(1),
> +	.spi_w = PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE,
>  	.init_reg_clock = pwrap_mt8173_init_reg_clock,
>  	.init_special = pwrap_mt8173_init_special,
>  };