linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] General RFKill improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1453813698.2759.41.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:08:18 +0100
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...il.com>
Cc:	marcel@...tmann.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jprvita@...lessm.com,
	linux@...lessm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] General RFKill improvements

Hi,

On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 10:42 -0500, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote:
> This series contains a few general improvements to the RFKill code,
> found while
> I was writing the rfkill-all / airplane mode LED trigger. All were
> points where
> I had to read twice or do some other kind of extra effort to fully
> understand
> it, so I think merging these changes will benefit someone trying to
> understand
> the RFKill subsystem in the future.

I applied some of this. I think we need to keep the "state" sysfs
interface, perhaps you want to document it more clearly. I also didn't
apply the first patch since I'd fixed the suspend/pause issue, please
see if any of your patches remain relevant and resend that.

Thanks,
johannes