[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A77B7B.2000305@nod.at>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:58:19 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Bill Pringlemeir <bpringlemeir@...ps.com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Alex Smith <alex.smith@...tec.com>,
Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Anup Patel <anup.patel@...adcom.com>,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/22] mtd: cs553x: Fix dependencies for !HAS_IOMEM archs
Geert,
Am 26.01.2016 um 12:00 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>> Not every arch has io memory nor can this driver ever work
>> on UML/i386.
>> So, unbreak the build by fixing the dependencies.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig
>> index 545d82b..b253654 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig
>> @@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ config MTD_NAND_CAFE
>> config MTD_NAND_CS553X
>> tristate "NAND support for CS5535/CS5536 (AMD Geode companion chip)"
>> depends on X86_32
>> + depends on !UML && HAS_IOMEM
>
> I don't think there's a need for the !UML dependency?
> Hence just "depends on X86_32 && HAS_IOMEM"?
Strictly speaking this would work as HAS_IOMEM implies !UML.
The build error shows that it fails also because UML/i386 is x86_32
but lacks some x86_32 stuff:
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c: In function ‘cs553x_init_one’:
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:212:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ioremap’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
this->IO_ADDR_R = this->IO_ADDR_W = ioremap(adr, 4096);
^
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:212:36: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default]
this->IO_ADDR_R = this->IO_ADDR_W = ioremap(adr, 4096);
^
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:256:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘iounmap’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
iounmap(this->IO_ADDR_R);
^
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c: In function ‘is_geode’:
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:266:19: error: ‘struct cpuinfo_um’ has no member named ‘x86_vendor’
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD &&
^
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:266:34: error: ‘X86_VENDOR_AMD’ undeclared (first use in this function)
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD &&
^
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:266:34: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:267:19: error: ‘struct cpuinfo_um’ has no member named ‘x86’
boot_cpu_data.x86 == 5 &&
^
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:268:19: error: ‘struct cpuinfo_um’ has no member named ‘x86_model’
boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 10)
^
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:271:20: error: ‘struct cpuinfo_um’ has no member named ‘x86_vendor’
if ((boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_NSC ||
^
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:271:35: error: ‘X86_VENDOR_NSC’ undeclared (first use in this function)
if ((boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_NSC ||
^
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:272:20: error: ‘struct cpuinfo_um’ has no member named ‘x86_vendor’
boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CYRIX) &&
^
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:272:35: error: ‘X86_VENDOR_CYRIX’ undeclared (first use in this function)
boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CYRIX) &&
^
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:273:19: error: ‘struct cpuinfo_um’ has no member named ‘x86’
boot_cpu_data.x86 == 5 &&
^
drivers/mtd/nand/cs553x_nand.c:274:19: error: ‘struct cpuinfo_um’ has no member named ‘x86_model’
boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 5)
Maybe a "depends on X86_32 && !UML" would make more sense. hmm?
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists