lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A78268.7020102@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:27:52 +0200
From:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 21/23] perf tools: adding perf_evlist to
 *info_priv_size()

On 25/01/16 23:08, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:48:28PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier escreveu:
>> On 14 January 2016 at 14:46, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> On some architecture the size of the private header may
>>> be dependent on the number of tracers used in the session.  As
>>> such adding a "struct perf_evlist *" parameter, which should
>>> contain all the required information.
>>>
>>> Also adjusting the existing client of the interface to take
>>> the new parameter into account.
>>>
>>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
>>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>>> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-bts.c | 4 +++-
>>>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c  | 4 +++-
>>>  tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c           | 7 ++++---
>>>  tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h           | 6 ++++--
>>>  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-bts.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-bts.c
>>> index 9b94ce520917..4685a40777cc 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-bts.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-bts.c
>>> @@ -60,7 +60,9 @@ struct branch {
>>>         u64 misc;
>>>  };
>>>
>>> -static size_t intel_bts_info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr __maybe_unused)
>>> +static size_t
>>> +intel_bts_info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr __maybe_unused,
>>> +                        struct perf_evlist *evlist __maybe_unused)
>>>  {
>>>         return INTEL_BTS_AUXTRACE_PRIV_SIZE;
>>>  }
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c
>>> index b02af064f0f9..e5c1f2e21f87 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c
>>> @@ -273,7 +273,9 @@ intel_pt_pmu_default_config(struct perf_pmu *intel_pt_pmu)
>>>         return attr;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -static size_t intel_pt_info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr __maybe_unused)
>>> +static size_t
>>> +intel_pt_info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr __maybe_unused,
>>> +                       struct perf_evlist *evlist __maybe_unused)
>>>  {
>>>         return INTEL_PT_AUXTRACE_PRIV_SIZE;
>>>  }
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
>>> index 7f10430af39c..cc1c9ce5cc56 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
>>> @@ -478,10 +478,11 @@ void auxtrace_heap__pop(struct auxtrace_heap *heap)
>>>                          heap_array[last].ordinal);
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -size_t auxtrace_record__info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr)
>>> +size_t auxtrace_record__info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>> +                                      struct perf_evlist *evlist)
>>>  {
>>>         if (itr)
>>> -               return itr->info_priv_size(itr);
>>> +               return itr->info_priv_size(itr, evlist);
>>>         return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> @@ -852,7 +853,7 @@ int perf_event__synthesize_auxtrace_info(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>>         int err;
>>>
>>>         pr_debug2("Synthesizing auxtrace information\n");
>>> -       priv_size = auxtrace_record__info_priv_size(itr);
>>> +       priv_size = auxtrace_record__info_priv_size(itr, session->evlist);
>>>         ev = zalloc(sizeof(struct auxtrace_info_event) + priv_size);
>>>         if (!ev)
>>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
>>> index b86f90db1352..e5a8e2d4f2af 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
>>> @@ -293,7 +293,8 @@ struct auxtrace_record {
>>>         int (*recording_options)(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>>                                  struct perf_evlist *evlist,
>>>                                  struct record_opts *opts);
>>> -       size_t (*info_priv_size)(struct auxtrace_record *itr);
>>> +       size_t (*info_priv_size)(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>> +                                struct perf_evlist *evlist);
>>>         int (*info_fill)(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>>                          struct perf_session *session,
>>>                          struct auxtrace_info_event *auxtrace_info,
>>> @@ -429,7 +430,8 @@ int auxtrace_parse_snapshot_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>>  int auxtrace_record__options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>>                              struct perf_evlist *evlist,
>>>                              struct record_opts *opts);
>>> -size_t auxtrace_record__info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr);
>>> +size_t auxtrace_record__info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>> +                                      struct perf_evlist *evlist);
>>>  int auxtrace_record__info_fill(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
>>>                                struct perf_session *session,
>>>                                struct auxtrace_info_event *auxtrace_info,
>>> --
>>> 2.1.4
>>>
>>
>> Arnaldo,
>>
>> As with my previous email, I can't queue this patch for 4.6 without at
>> least a reviewed by from you.
>>
>> It has been rebased to 4.5-rc1 here [1] for your convenience.  I will
>> be happy to use another baseline should that be more adequate for you.
> 
> Adrian, are you ok with this?

I will try to look at this and the others in the next day or two.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ