lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A78D56.2030902@fau.de>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:14:30 +0100
From:	Andreas Ziegler <andreas.ziegler@....de>
To:	"Rosen, Rami" <rami.rosen@...el.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	"cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Fix misspelling of CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA in
 comments

On 01/26/2016 16:08, Rosen, Rami wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> @@ -604,11 +604,11 @@ static inline struct cgroup *sock_cgroup_ptr(struct sock_cgroup_data *skcd)
>  #endif
>  }
> 
> In this occasion, seems that maybe something else is also missing:
> Shouldn't it be hereafter : +#else /* !CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA */ 
> instead ? 
>    
> -#else	/* CONFIG_CGROUP_DATA */
> +#else	/* CONFIG_SOCK_CGROUP_DATA */

It seems that there is no real consensus among the developers for that
particular case:

ziegler@box:~/linux$ git grep "#else \/\* \!CONFIG_" | wc -l
327
ziegler@box:~/linux$ git grep "#else \/\* CONFIG_" | wc -l
564

I don't mind changing it, I'm just not sure if that's what we want.

Regards,

Andreas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ