[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26439572.8QBco8eDYu@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:18:25 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Andreas Fenkart <afenkart@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: don't print uninitialized variables
On Tuesday 26 January 2016 16:52:40 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > @@ -2133,7 +2131,17 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > omap_hsmmc_conf_bus_power(host);
> >
> > - if (!pdev->dev.of_node) {
> > + host->tx_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(&pdev->dev, "tx");
> > + host->rx_chan = dma_request_slave_channel(&pdev->dev, "rx");
> > + if (!host->tx_chan || !host->rx_chan) {
>
> While it is really unlikely that we are failing to get only one of the
> channels... It means anyway that the omap_hsmmc is not usable, but we will
> still try to get via legacy mode and there is a chance that we might get some
> channel.
>
> Too bad that I can not send the conversion to dma_request_chan() yet due to
> missing things in arch...
>
> It might be simpler to just remove the printout of the rx/tx_req from the
> dev_err() when reporting failed channel requests...
Fine with me too, I'll send that patch as well and let Ulf pick.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists