[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53cf5cb2a96a236925bb2901e3c417f8@agner.ch>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:04:20 -0800
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To: michael.hennerich@...log.com
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org, realmz6@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
jic23@...nel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] input: touchscreen: ad7879: fix default x/y axis
assignment
On 2016-01-25 23:58, Michael Hennerich wrote:
> On 01/26/2016 04:04 AM, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> The measurements read from the controller which are temporary stored
>> in conversion_data, are interpreted wrong. The first measurement X+
>> contains the Y position, and the second measurement Y+ the X position
>> (see also Table 11 Register Table in the data sheet).
>>
>> The problem is already known and a swap option has been introduced:
>> commit 6680884a4420 ("Input: ad7879 - add option to correct xy axis")
>>
>> However, with that the meaning of the new boolean is inverted since
>> the underlying values are already swapped. With this change, a true
>> in swap_xy actually swaps the two axis.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
>> ---
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> It seems that swap_xy is not used in any board which is in mainline,
>> hence swap_xy is always false. Therefore, up until now all boards
>> actually used swapped axis. However, I doubt that the blackfin boards
>> really have those axis swapped, it is probably more likely that the
>> userspace calibration took care of it.
>>
>> However, if they are really swapped, we should set the swap_xy flag
>> to 1 for those board...
>>
>> Do you happen to now what is the case with those boards?
>>
>
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I would be hesitant to invert the default behaviour of the driver.
> Too many people in the field already using it as it is.
Afaik, we should be able to change in-kernel API's (especially if they
are wrong) since we do not guarantee any API...
>
> A XY swap can have multiple reasons.
>
> Lot's of small VGA/QVGA TFTs have the option to switch the scan
> direction from Landscape to Portrait. In addition you can also rotate
> and flip or mirror using VDMA options. So it really depends on the use
> case, how the touch panel is mounted to the screen or how it is wired.
Ok, I see the reason for that functionality.
I am mainly concerned about the new DT bindings. The touchscreen binding
documents specify touchscreen-swapped-x-y, see:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/touchscreen.txt
I would like to make sure that this property is really swapping axis
(and not necessary if the hardware is implemented according to the
datasheet...)
We could also implement a workaround to keep the platform data behavior
as is (invert the swap_xy flag)...
--
Stefan
>> --
>> Stefan
>>
>> drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c
>> index a73934b..e290e7b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ad7879.c
>> @@ -94,8 +94,8 @@
>> #define AD7879_TEMP_BIT (1<<1)
>>
>> enum {
>> - AD7879_SEQ_XPOS = 0,
>> - AD7879_SEQ_YPOS = 1,
>> + AD7879_SEQ_YPOS = 0,
>> + AD7879_SEQ_XPOS = 1,
>> AD7879_SEQ_Z1 = 2,
>> AD7879_SEQ_Z2 = 3,
>> AD7879_NR_SENSE = 4,
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists