| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1453865806-4661-3-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:36:38 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/10] rtc: max77686: Use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of current array length
It is better to use the ARRAY_SIZE() macro instead of the array length
to avoid bugs if the array is later changed and the length not updated.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
---
Changes in v4:
- Add Andi Shyti's Reviewed-by to patch #2.
Changes in v3:
- Add Krzysztof Kozlowski's Tested-by tag to patch #2.
- Add Laxman Dewangan's Acked-by tag to patch #2.
- Use ARRAY_SIZE() in all places. Suggested by Laxman Dewangan.
Changes in v2:
- Add Krzysztof Kozlowski's Reviewed-by tag to patch #2.
drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
index 6653c3d11b66..d84a50c9f7f7 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
goto out;
ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
- MAX77686_RTC_SEC, data, RTC_NR_TIME);
+ MAX77686_RTC_SEC, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to read time reg(%d)\n", __func__, ret);
goto out;
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
mutex_lock(&info->lock);
ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
- MAX77686_RTC_SEC, data, RTC_NR_TIME);
+ MAX77686_RTC_SEC, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write time reg(%d)\n", __func__,
ret);
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
goto out;
ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
- MAX77686_ALARM1_SEC, data, RTC_NR_TIME);
+ MAX77686_ALARM1_SEC, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(info->dev, "%s:%d fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n",
__func__, __LINE__, ret);
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
max77686_rtc_data_to_tm(data, &alrm->time, info->rtc_24hr_mode);
alrm->enabled = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < RTC_NR_TIME; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data); i++) {
if (data[i] & ALARM_ENABLE_MASK) {
alrm->enabled = 1;
break;
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
goto out;
ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
- MAX77686_ALARM1_SEC, data, RTC_NR_TIME);
+ MAX77686_ALARM1_SEC, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n",
__func__, ret);
@@ -261,11 +261,11 @@ static int max77686_rtc_stop_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
max77686_rtc_data_to_tm(data, &tm, info->rtc_24hr_mode);
- for (i = 0; i < RTC_NR_TIME; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data); i++)
data[i] &= ~ALARM_ENABLE_MASK;
ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
- MAX77686_ALARM1_SEC, data, RTC_NR_TIME);
+ MAX77686_ALARM1_SEC, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n",
__func__, ret);
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_start_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
goto out;
ret = regmap_bulk_read(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
- MAX77686_ALARM1_SEC, data, RTC_NR_TIME);
+ MAX77686_ALARM1_SEC, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to read alarm reg(%d)\n",
__func__, ret);
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_start_alarm(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
data[RTC_DATE] |= (1 << ALARM_ENABLE_SHIFT);
ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
- MAX77686_ALARM1_SEC, data, RTC_NR_TIME);
+ MAX77686_ALARM1_SEC, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n",
__func__, ret);
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
goto out;
ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
- MAX77686_ALARM1_SEC, data, RTC_NR_TIME);
+ MAX77686_ALARM1_SEC, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write alarm reg(%d)\n",
@@ -406,7 +406,8 @@ static int max77686_rtc_init_reg(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
info->rtc_24hr_mode = 1;
- ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap, MAX77686_RTC_CONTROLM, data, 2);
+ ret = regmap_bulk_write(info->max77686->rtc_regmap,
+ MAX77686_RTC_CONTROLM, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(info->dev, "%s: fail to write controlm reg(%d)\n",
__func__, ret);
--
2.5.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists