lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1601261637440.18055@linuxheads99>
Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:24:08 -0600
From:	atull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
To:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:	Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>,
	Josh Cartwright <joshc@...com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<monstr@...str.eu>, <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"Ian Campbell" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
	<delicious.quinoa@...il.com>, <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 1/6] fpga: add bindings document for fpga area and
 fpga bus

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:24:22PM -0600, atull@...nsource.altera.com wrote:
> > From: Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
> > 
> > New bindings document for FPGA Area for reprogramming
> > FPGA's under Device Tree control
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
> > ---
> > v9:  initial version added to this patchset
> > v10: s/fpga/FPGA/g
> >      replace DT overlay example with slightly more complicated example
> >      move to staging/simple-fpga-bus
> > v11: No change in this patch for v11 of the patch set
> > v12: Moved out of staging.
> >      Changed to use FPGA bridges framework instead of resets
> >      for bridges.
> > v13: bridge@...f20000 -> bridge@...00000, etc
> >      Leave out directly talking about overlays
> >      Remove regs and clocks directly under simple-fpga-bus in example
> >      Use common "firmware-name" binding instead of "fpga-firmware"
> > v14: Use firmware-name in bindings description
> >      Call it FPGA Area
> >      Remove bindings that specify FPGA Manager and FPGA Bridges
> > v15: Cleanup as per Rob's comments
> >      Combine usage doc with bindings document
> >      Document as being Altera specific
> >      Additions and changes to add FPGA Bus
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/fpga/altera-fpga-bus-fpga-area.txt    |  452 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 452 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/altera-fpga-bus-fpga-area.txt
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/altera-fpga-bus-fpga-area.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/altera-fpga-bus-fpga-area.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..8ea38ca
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/altera-fpga-bus-fpga-area.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,452 @@
> > +Altera FPGA Area and FPGA Bus Device Tree Binding
> 
> Getting closer I think...

Great!

> 
> > +
> > +Alan Tull 2016
> > +
> > + CONTENTS
> > + - Introduction
> > + - Terminology
> > + - Overview
> > + - Constraints
> > + - FPGA Bus
> > + - FPGA Area
> > + - Supported Use Models
> > + - Sequence
> > + - Device Tree Examples
> > +
> > +
> > +Introduction
> > +============
> > +
> > +FPGA Buses and FPGA Areas are introduced as a way to solve the problem of how to
> > +reprogram an Altera FPGA under an operating system and have the new hardware
> > +show up in the device tree.  By adding these bindings to the Device Tree, a
> > +system can have the information needed to do the FPGA programming to add the
> > +desired hardware, and also the information about the devices to be added to the
> > +Device Tree once the programming has succeeded.
> > +
> > +
> > +Terminology
> > +===========
> > +
> > +Full Reconfiguration
> > + * The entire FPGA is programmed.
> > +
> > +Partial Reconfiguration (PR)
> > + * The FPGA is broken up into regions.  One of these regions is reprogrammed
> > +   while the rest of the FPGA is not affected.  Not all FPGA's support this.
> > +
> > +FPGA Manager & FPGA Manager Framework
> > + * An FPGA Manager is a hardware block that programs an FPGA under the control
> > +   of a host processor.
> > + * The FPGA Manager Framework provides drivers and functions to program an
> > +   FPGA.
> > +
> > +FPGA Bridge & FPGA Bridge Framework
> > + * Provides drivers and functions to control bridges that enable/disable
> > +   data to the FPGA.
> > + * FPGA Bridges should be disabled while the FPGA is being programmed to
> > +   prevent spurious data on the bus.
> > + * FPGA Bridges may not be needed in implementations where the FPGA Manager
> > +   handles this.
> > +
> > +Freeze Blocks
> > + * Freeze Blocks function as FPGA Bridges within the FPGA fabric.  In the case
> > +   of PR, the buses from the processor are split within the FPGA.  Each PR
> > +   region gets its own split of the buses, protected by an independently
> > +   controlled Freeze Block.  Several busses may be connected to a single
> > +   PR region; a Freeze Block controls the traffic of all these busses
> > +   together.
> > +
> > +Controlling Bridge
> > + * The processor and FPGA may be connected by multiple FPGA Bridges.  In a text
> > +   based hierarchy, it is difficult to show this properly as a device would
> > +   have several parents.
> > + * The bridge that handles register access to the FPGA is designated the
> > +   "controlling" bridge.
> > + * The controlling bridge will be the target point under which the overlay is
> > +   inserted.
> > +
> > +
> > +Overview
> > +========
> > +
> > +This binding introduces the FPGA Bus and FPGA Area.
> > +
> > +An FPGA Bus is a virtualized bus that contains the devices needed to be able to
> > +program an FPGA device.  It contains a child FPGA Manager and may contain child
> > +FPGA Bridges, if needed.  The FPGA Manager is the hardware block that handles
> > +programming the FPGA.  FPGA Bridges function to prevent spurious data from the
> > +FPGA going on the processor busses during FPGA programming.  In the case of
> > +partial reconfiguration, additional bridges (Freeze Blocks) for each
> > +reconfiguration region are required.
> > +
> > +An FPGA Area contains information about a section of an FPGA (in the case of
> > +partial reconfiguration or the whole FPGA (for full reconfiguration).  The FPGA
> > +Area contains the name of the FPGA image file to be programmed and the child
> > +devices that will be contained in the FPGA after programming.
> > +
> > +The intended use is that device tree overlays can be used to add hardware to an
> > +FPGA while an operating system is running.  In that case, the FPGA Bus and its
> > +associated information will exist in the live device tree, while FPGA Areas are
> > +added to the device tree by applying device tree overlays while the operating
> > +system is running.  Loading such an overlay will cause the FPGA to be programmed
> > +and the child devices to be populated.  Removing an overlay will cause the
> > +devices to be removed from the device tree and free up those FPGA resources.
> > +
> > +
> > +Constraints
> > +===========
> > +
> > +It is beyond the scope of this document to fully describe all the FPGA design
> > +constraints required to make partial reconfiguration work[1] [2], but a few
> > +deserve quick mention.  A partial reconfiguration FPGA image must have
> > +boundary connections that line up with those the current programming of the
> > +FPGA.  Also, those during programming, those connections must be frozen.  This
> > +can be achieved by "Freeze Blocks" which are FPGA Bridges that exist on the FPGA
> > +fabric prior to the partial reconfiguration.
> > +
> > +
> > +FPGA Bus
> > +========
> > +
> > +An FPGA bus is a virtualized bus that specifies the devices needed to program an
> > +FPGA.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible : should contain "altr,fpga-bus" and "simple-bus"
> > +	       "simple-bus" is required to allow populating the child nodes.
> 
> I think I said this before, but you should not need simple-bus. Having 
> it is wrong if the bus requires some configuration before enumerating 
> the child nodes. The way you have it, the bridge driver could probe 
> before the FPGA manager or vice-versa. I'm guessing one way will work 
> and the other will not, and you are getting lucky. You should also test 
> will the overlay applied before boot (i.e. single dtb with all areas 
> populated). The simple rule is does the node (containing simple-bus) 
> require configuration for child nodes to be accessed? If yes, you can't 
> use simple-bus.

Yes you did say that before.  Thanks for the explanation here, it
clarifies a lot.  I'll work on something that implements this without
relying on luck and simple-busses.

> 
> Part of your problem is you may need a custom match table. Using 
> of_default_bus_match_table will only match the immediate child nodes of 
> the starting node. Alternatively, you need to make the bridge node the 
> starting node.
> 

Not sure what you ment here, maybe you mean leaving out the fpga-bus?
I'm using fpga-bus to bring the specific manager and bridges together
needed to handle reprogramming cycles on a specific FPGA.

> > +
> > +A FPGA Bus should contain an FPGA Manager as a child node.
> > +
> > +A FPGA Bus may require FPGA Bridges as child nodes if the FPGA Manager does not
> > +control the hardware bridges.
> > +
> > +The FPGA Bridge that allows memory mapped register access is designated the
> > +"controlling" bridge.  This bridge serves as the insertion point of DT overlays.
> > +Both the FPGA Area and the controlling bridge require the "simple-bus"
> > +compatibility string to allow populating the child nodes contained in the
> > +overlay.
> > +
> > +In the example below, fpgamgr@...06000 would be used to do any programming
> > +operations on the FPGA and the two bridges specified would be disabled
> > +during the programming and re-enabled afterwards if the programming
> > +succeeds.
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +	fpgabus@0 {
> 
> If you have a unit-address, then there should be a reg property or 
> ranges parent bus addr.
> 
> > +		compatible = "altr,fpga-bus", "simple-bus";
> > +		#address-cells = <0x1>;
> > +		#size-cells = <0x1>;
> > +		ranges;
> > +
> > +		fpgamgr@...06000 {
> 
> As mentioned in the other thread, this may be better done as a phandle, 
> but I don't feel too strongly either way.

I can see reasons for having the fpga manager and also the bridges
specified by phandle within a fpga-bus.  So an fpga-bus will add the
following propertities:

        fpga-mgr = <fpgamgr0>;
	fpga-bridges = <bridge0>, <bridge1>;

> 
> > +			compatible = "altr,socfpga-fpga-mgr";
> > +			reg = <0xff706000 0x1000
> > +			       0xffb90000 0x1000>;
> > +			interrupts = <0 175 4>;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		bridge@0 {
> 
> Same here. Doesn't this bridge have some associated address range.
> 
> Essentially, the hierarchy from child devices up to the root should 
> reflect the address decoding at each step.

Yes

> 
> > +			compatible = "altr,socfpga-lwhps2fpga-bridge",
> > +				     "simple-bus";
> > +			resets = <&rst LWHPS2FPGA_RESET>;
> > +			reset-names = "lwhps2fpga";
> > +			clocks = <&l4_main_clk>;
> > +			#address-cells = <0x1>;
> > +			#size-cells = <0x1>;
> > +			ranges;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		bridge@1 {
> > +			compatible = "altr,socfpga-hps2fpga-bridge";
> > +			resets = <&rst HPS2FPGA_RESET>;
> > +			reset-names = "hps2fpga";
> > +			clocks = <&l4_main_clk>;
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +
> > +FPGA Area
> > +=========
> > +
> > +An FPGA Area details information about a section of an FPGA including the FPGA
> > +image needed to program it and the hardware contained once it is programmed.
> > +
> > +An FPGA Area corresponds to the whole FPGA in the case of full reconfiguration
> > +or a section of an FPGA in the case of partial reconfiguration.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible : should contain "altr,fpga-area"
> > +- #address-cells, #size-cells, ranges: must be present to handle address space
> > +  mapping for children.
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- firmware-name : should contain the name of an FPGA image file located on the
> > +  firmware search path.
> > +- partial-reconfig : boolean property should be defined if partial
> > +  reconfiguration of the FPGA is to be done, otherwise full reconfiguration
> > +  is done.
> > +
> > +In the example below, the target path is the controlling bridge of the FPGA Bus
> > +example.  The FPGA would be programmed with the image contained in the
> > +"soc_system.rbf" specified.  Assuming programming succeeds, the child devices
> > +would be populated afterwords.  In this particular example, ranges has two
> > +chip selects as one memory region is tied to the host processor and the
> > +other is a memory region on the FPGA.
> > +
> > +If there are no bridges in the FPGA Bus, the target path would point to
> > +the FPGA Manager.
> 
> How do you not have a bridge? There has to be something preventing 
> access. Do you really mean the bridge and fpga-mgr blocks are combined 
> into 1?

In the Xilinx case, the manager and bridge are still two hardware
blocks but handled together by the manager driver.  I didn't want to
make Moritz write a FPGA Bridge when he already had code that handled
his hardware bridges when he told his manager to do a write cycle.

> 
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +/plugin/;
> > +/ {
> > +	fragment@0 {
> > +		target-path="/soc/fpgamgr@...06000/bridge@0";
> > +		__overlay__ {
> > +			#address-cells = <1>;
> > +		        #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > +			bridge@...00000 {
> 
> Wouldn't this be area@...? area is a bit too generic. I'd use 
> "fpga-area" for the node name too.

This could be called fpga-area or fpga-region.  More on that below.

> 
> > +				compatible = "fpga-area";
> > +
> > +				#address-cells = <2>;
> > +				#size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > +				ranges = <0 0x00000000 0xc0000000 0x00010000>,
> > +					 <1 0x00020000 0xff220000 0x00000008>,
> > +					 <1 0x00010040 0xff210040 0x00000020>;
> > +
> > +				firmware-name = "soc_system.rbf";
> > +
> > +				onchip_memory2_0: memory@0 {
> > +					device_type = "memory";
> > +					compatible = "altr,onchipmem-15.1";
> > +					reg = <0 0x00000000 0x00010000>;
> > +				};
> > +
> > +				jtag_uart: serial@...020000 {
> > +					compatible = "altr,juart-1.0";
> > +					reg = <1 0x00020000 0x00000008>;
> > +					interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> > +					interrupts = <0 42 4>;
> > +				};
> > +
> > +				led_pio: gpio@...010040 {
> > +					compatible = "altr,pio-1.0";
> > +					reg = <1 0x00010040 0x00000020>;
> > +					altr,gpio-bank-width = <4>;
> > +					#gpio-cells = <2>;
> > +					gpio-controller;
> > +				};
> > +			};
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +};
> > +
> > +Supported Use Models
> > +====================
> > +
> > +Here's a list of supported use models.  We may need to add more.  Some uses are
> > +specific to one FPGA device or another.
> > +
> > + * No FPGA Bridges
> > +   In this case, the FPGA Manager which programs the FPGA also handles the
> > +   bridges.  No FPGA Bridge devices are needed for full reconfiguration.
> > +
> > +   The DT overlay will specify the FPGA Manager as the overlay target.
> > +
> > + * Full reconfiguration with bridges
> > +   In the case, there are several bridges between the processor and FPGA, that
> > +   need to be disabled during full reconfiguration.  The live DT before the
> > +   overlay is applied will have an FPGA Bus.
> > +
> > +   The DT overlay will specify the controlling bridge as the overlay target.
> > +
> > + * Partial reconfiguration with bridges in the FPGA
> > +   In this case, the FPGA will have more than one section that will be
> > +   programmed separately.  Other sections may be active on the bus while FPGA
> > +   is being programmed.  To manage this, Freeze blocks need to exist on the FPGA
> > +   that can freeze all the buses going to one FPGA area while the buses are
> > +   enabled for other sections.
> > +
> > +Sequence
> > +========
> > +
> > +When a DT overlay is loaded, the FPGA Area will be probed and will do the
> > +following:
> > + 1. Disable the FPGA Bridges.
> > + 2. Use the the FPGA manager core to program the FPGA.
> > + 3. Enable the FPGA Bridges.
> > + 4. Call of_platform_populate resulting in device drivers getting probed.
> > +
> > +When the overlay is removed, the FPGA Area in it is removed.  This causes the
> > +child nodes to be removed and then the bridges are disabled.
> > +
> > +Device Tree Examples
> > +====================
> > +
> > +The intention of this section is to give some simple examples, focusing on
> > +the placement of the elements detailed above, especially:
> > + * FPGA Bus and associated FPGA Manager and FPGA Bridges
> > + * FPGA Area and associated properties
> > + * simple-bus
> > + * ranges
> > + * target-path
> > +
> > +For the purposes of this section, I'm dividing the Device Tree into two parts,
> > +each with its own requirements.  The two parts are:
> > + * The live DT prior to the overlay being added
> > + * The DT overlay
> > +
> > +The live Device Tree must contain an FPGA Bus, which has a child FPGA Manager to
> > +handle programming the FPGA.  If FPGA Bridges need to be involved, they show up
> > +in the DT as direct children of the FPGA Bus.  During full reconfiguration, the
> > +FPGA Area will disable any bridges that are direct children of the FPGA Bus and
> > +will re-enable them after FPGA programming has succeeded.
> > +
> > +The Device Tree Overlay will contain:
> > + * "target-path"
> > +   The insertion point where the the contents of the overlay will go into the
> > +   live tree.
> > + * "ranges"
> > + * "firmware-name"
> > +   Specifies the name of the FPGA image file on the firmware search
> > +   path.  The search path is described in the firmware class documentation.
> > + * "partial-reconfig"
> > +   This binding is a boolean and should be present if partial reconfiguration
> > +   is to be done.
> > + * child nodes corresponding to hardware that will be loaded in this region of
> > +   the FPGA.
> > +
> > +
> > +Device Tree Example: Partial Reconfiguration with no Bridges
> > +============================================================
> > +
> > +Live Device Tree contains:
> > +	fpgamgr@...03000 {
> > +		compatible = "altr,socfpga-a10-fpga-mgr", "simple-bus";
> > +		clocks = <&l4_mp_clk>;
> > +		resets = <&rst FPGAMGR_RESET>;
> > +		reset-names = "fpgamgr";
> > +		reg = <0xffd03000 0x1000
> > +		       0xffcfe400 0x1000>;
> > +
> > +		#address-cells = <0x1>;
> > +		#size-cells = <0x1>;
> > +		ranges;
> > +	};
> > +
> > +DT Overlay contains:
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +/plugin/;
> > +/ {
> > +	fragment@0 {
> > +		target-path="/soc/fpgamgr@...03000";  /* targeted to the manager */
> > +		__overlay__ {
> > +			#address-cells = <1>;
> > +		        #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > +			area@0 {
> 
> Are the number of areas software configurable? If not, then the areas 
> should be part of the base DT rather than the overlay.

The number of areas is set by the FPGA image that creates the areas.
A base FPGA image could be loaded by the bootloader or by the OS with
a set number of area slots available.

So this could be done differently, divided into something where the
areas (some call them "regions") are created in the live DT when the
base FPGA image is loaded.  Then the overlays would have something
called 'personas' that plug into them.  The areas would contain the
information of which bridges to control and which fpga manager.  Maybe
this heirarchy (indexes are probably screwed up below).

Below, the fpga manager and hardware fpga bridges are specified
outside the fpga bus and are referred to by phandles.  Leaving out
ranges, cells for brevity.

Live tree (after base FPGA image is loaded):
fpga-bus@0 {
	compatible = "fpga-bus";
	fpga-mgr = <fpgamgr@...ething>;
	fpga-bridges = <..>, <..>;

	fpga-area@0 { 
		compatible = "fpga-area";
		bridges = <bridge@>;
	};

	fpga-area@... { 
		compatible = "fpga-area";
		bridges = <bridge@...>;
	};
};		

The overlay would target one of the fpga-area's and contain
the firmware-name and children.

In the case of full reconfiguration, there would not be any
fpga-areas.  The overlay would target the fpga-bus.

> 
> > +				compatible = "fpga-area";
> > +
> > +				#address-cells = <1>;
> > +				#size-cells = <1>;
> > +				ranges = <0x10010 0xff210010 0x10>;
> > +
> > +				firmware-name = "fit_pr_v1.rbf";
> > +				partial-reconfig;
> > +
> > +				gpio@...010010 {
> 
> gpio@...10

OK

> 
> > +					compatible = "altr,pio-1.0";
> > +					reg = <0x10010 0x10>;
> > +					altr,ngpio = <4>;
> > +					#gpio-cells = <0x2>;
> > +					gpio-controller;
> > +				};
> > +			};
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +};
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ