[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160127180908.460086617@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:12:06 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 12/67] ALSA: seq: Fix missing NULL check at remove_events ioctl
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
commit 030e2c78d3a91dd0d27fef37e91950dde333eba1 upstream.
snd_seq_ioctl_remove_events() calls snd_seq_fifo_clear()
unconditionally even if there is no FIFO assigned, and this leads to
an Oops due to NULL dereference. The fix is just to add a proper NULL
check.
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c
+++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c
@@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ static int snd_seq_ioctl_remove_events(s
* No restrictions so for a user client we can clear
* the whole fifo
*/
- if (client->type == USER_CLIENT)
+ if (client->type == USER_CLIENT && client->data.user.fifo)
snd_seq_fifo_clear(client->data.user.fifo);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists