[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160127180910.177355169@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:12:13 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 19/67] ALSA: timer: Fix race among timer ioctls
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
commit af368027a49a751d6ff4ee9e3f9961f35bb4fede upstream.
ALSA timer ioctls have an open race and this may lead to a
use-after-free of timer instance object. A simplistic fix is to make
each ioctl exclusive. We have already tread_sem for controlling the
tread, and extend this as a global mutex to be applied to each ioctl.
The downside is, of course, the worse concurrency. But these ioctls
aren't to be parallel accessible, in anyway, so it should be fine to
serialize there.
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
sound/core/timer.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/sound/core/timer.c
+++ b/sound/core/timer.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct snd_timer_user {
struct timespec tstamp; /* trigger tstamp */
wait_queue_head_t qchange_sleep;
struct fasync_struct *fasync;
- struct mutex tread_sem;
+ struct mutex ioctl_lock;
};
/* list of timers */
@@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static int snd_timer_user_open(struct in
return -ENOMEM;
spin_lock_init(&tu->qlock);
init_waitqueue_head(&tu->qchange_sleep);
- mutex_init(&tu->tread_sem);
+ mutex_init(&tu->ioctl_lock);
tu->ticks = 1;
tu->queue_size = 128;
tu->queue = kmalloc(tu->queue_size * sizeof(struct snd_timer_read),
@@ -1283,8 +1283,10 @@ static int snd_timer_user_release(struct
if (file->private_data) {
tu = file->private_data;
file->private_data = NULL;
+ mutex_lock(&tu->ioctl_lock);
if (tu->timeri)
snd_timer_close(tu->timeri);
+ mutex_unlock(&tu->ioctl_lock);
kfree(tu->queue);
kfree(tu->tqueue);
kfree(tu);
@@ -1522,7 +1524,6 @@ static int snd_timer_user_tselect(struct
int err = 0;
tu = file->private_data;
- mutex_lock(&tu->tread_sem);
if (tu->timeri) {
snd_timer_close(tu->timeri);
tu->timeri = NULL;
@@ -1566,7 +1567,6 @@ static int snd_timer_user_tselect(struct
}
__err:
- mutex_unlock(&tu->tread_sem);
return err;
}
@@ -1779,7 +1779,7 @@ enum {
SNDRV_TIMER_IOCTL_PAUSE_OLD = _IO('T', 0x23),
};
-static long snd_timer_user_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
+static long __snd_timer_user_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg)
{
struct snd_timer_user *tu;
@@ -1796,17 +1796,11 @@ static long snd_timer_user_ioctl(struct
{
int xarg;
- mutex_lock(&tu->tread_sem);
- if (tu->timeri) { /* too late */
- mutex_unlock(&tu->tread_sem);
+ if (tu->timeri) /* too late */
return -EBUSY;
- }
- if (get_user(xarg, p)) {
- mutex_unlock(&tu->tread_sem);
+ if (get_user(xarg, p))
return -EFAULT;
- }
tu->tread = xarg ? 1 : 0;
- mutex_unlock(&tu->tread_sem);
return 0;
}
case SNDRV_TIMER_IOCTL_GINFO:
@@ -1839,6 +1833,18 @@ static long snd_timer_user_ioctl(struct
return -ENOTTY;
}
+static long snd_timer_user_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
+ unsigned long arg)
+{
+ struct snd_timer_user *tu = file->private_data;
+ long ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&tu->ioctl_lock);
+ ret = __snd_timer_user_ioctl(file, cmd, arg);
+ mutex_unlock(&tu->ioctl_lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int snd_timer_user_fasync(int fd, struct file * file, int on)
{
struct snd_timer_user *tu;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists