[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <56A88998.5040602@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 18:10:48 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64/clk: EXYNOS: Consolidate Exynos7 symbol
On 26.01.2016 17:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Third attempt to remove ARCH_EXYNOS7 symbol.
>
> Patches cannot be cherry-picked. I was thinking about merging this
> through arm-soc tree after getting needed acks (clk, arm-soc?).
The patchset was rebased on quite old linux-next. Rebasing on current
code makes only one difference - the s3c64xx gained multiplatform support.
I don't want to spam the lists so, I'll respin everything tomorrow after
proper rebasing.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
>
> Changes since v2:
> =================
> 1. Follow Arnd's advice about not enabling silently the newly added
> EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK, when COMPILE_TEST is enabled. This was
> also a trigger for some changes in placement of Samsung clocks
> Kconfig entries...
> 2. ... which lead to introducing patch 1.
>
>
> Logic:
> ======
> Now the clock selection algorithm works like:
> 1. For Exynos ARMv7 and ARMv8 the platforms select COMMON_CLK
> and COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG.
> 2. As before: clock drivers for Exynos ARMv7 will be selected by
> respective SOC/ARCH_EXYNOS_XXX symbol.
> 3. For Exynos ARMv8 the clock drivers will be enabled by default
> by EXYNOS_ARM64_COMMON_CLK symbol.
>
> Rationale:
> ==========
> We don't need ARCH_EXYNOS7 symbol because all ARMv8 platforms should
> fall under generic ARCH_EXYNOS. In the same time there is no sense
> in building clocks for these ARMv8 SoCs on ARMv7 builds. In future
> this will also influence PMU [1] driver.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org/msg48090.html
>
>
> Krzysztof Kozlowski (3):
> clk: samsung: Enable COMPILE_TEST for Samsung clocks
> clk: samsung: Don't build ARMv8 clock drivers on ARMv7
> arm64: EXYNOS: Consolidate ARCH_EXYNOS7 symbol into ARCH_EXYNOS
>
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 12 +++---------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig | 14 +++++++++-----
> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 4 ++--
> 10 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists